fix(sqllab): Bump duckdb-engine version to 0.9.5

[guenp]

SUMMARY

Currently, when a user selects a DuckDB database, the schema dropdown shows multiple instances of main. This was an issue in the SQLAlchemy driver and has been fixed on the latest version of duckdb_engine.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS

Before:

After:

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

• Add a DuckDB database to Superset
• Open SQLLab
• Select the duckdb database
• Click on the "schema" dropdown
• Schema dropdown should contain unique db_name.schema_name items instead of many main schema duplicates

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

• Has associated issue: 404 on GET and DELETE on tableschemaview for Admin role user with all permissions on TableSchemaView for 3.0.0 #26286
• Required feature flags:
• Changes UI
• Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
  • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
  • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
  • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
• Introduces new feature or API
• Removes existing feature or API

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6f6c37e) 69.14% compared to head (868b218) 69.14%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26405      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.14%   69.14%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1946     1946              
  Lines       75990    75990              
  Branches     8479     8479              
==========================================
- Hits        52544    52543       -1     
- Misses      21267    21268       +1     
  Partials     2179     2179              

Flag	Coverage Δ
hive	53.68% <ø> (ø)
mysql	78.07% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
postgres	78.17% <ø> (ø)
presto	53.63% <ø> (ø)
python	82.85% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
sqlite	76.83% <ø> (ø)
unit	55.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[villebro]

LGTM, but wondering if we should add an upper bound? I know you maintain the driver, so you're the best person to say if this is a valid concern or not..

[villebro]

LGTM