Skip to content

Conversation

@uros-db
Copy link
Contributor

@uros-db uros-db commented Oct 30, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR follows up on #52627, and addresses a gap - GeographyType and GeometryType should be included in __all__.

Why are the changes needed?

Include geospatial types in all for types.py.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests suffice.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@uros-db uros-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zhengruifeng Please review.

@zhengruifeng
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the quick fix!
also cc @jaceklaskowski

@zhengruifeng
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merged to master

huangxiaopingRD pushed a commit to huangxiaopingRD/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
…pe to `__all__` in types

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR follows up on apache#52627, and addresses a gap - `GeographyType` and `GeometryType` should be included in `__all__`.

### Why are the changes needed?
Include geospatial types in __all__ for `types.py`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests suffice.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.

Closes apache#52790 from uros-db/geo-python-types-all.

Authored-by: Uros Bojanic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants