-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-53637][BUILD] Demote bcprov-jdk18on to test scope #52390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cc @dongjoon-hyun and @cnauroth |
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM (Pending CIs) for Apache Spark 4.1.0-preview2.
Thank you, @pan3793 .
cnauroth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pan3793 , thank you for taking care of this. Does LICENSE-binary need an update too?
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary#L482
|
@cnauroth right, thanks for catching this, removed. |
cnauroth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the update!
|
Merged to master for Apache Spark 4.1.0-preview2. |
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade `bouncycastle` to 1.82. Note that `bouncycastle` was demoted to the `test` scope after Apache Hadoop 3.4.2 - #52390 - [HADOOP-19152: Do not hard code security providers](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19152) ### Why are the changes needed? - Release Note: https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java/?filter=java%3Drelease-1-82 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, this is a test dependency change. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #52407 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53661. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR logically reverts SPARK-51311. ### Why are the changes needed? HADOOP-19152 has already been included in Hadoop 3.4.2 via apache/hadoop#7439, the previous workaround is unnecessary anymore. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I manually tested it in a kerberized cluster with a SparkPi. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#52390 from pan3793/SPARK-53637. Authored-by: Cheng Pan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade `bouncycastle` to 1.82. Note that `bouncycastle` was demoted to the `test` scope after Apache Hadoop 3.4.2 - apache#52390 - [HADOOP-19152: Do not hard code security providers](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19152) ### Why are the changes needed? - Release Note: https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java/?filter=java%3Drelease-1-82 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, this is a test dependency change. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#52407 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53661. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR logically reverts SPARK-51311.
Why are the changes needed?
HADOOP-19152 has already been included in Hadoop 3.4.2 via apache/hadoop#7439, the previous workaround is unnecessary anymore.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
I manually tested it in a kerberized cluster with a SparkPi.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.