Skip to content

[SPARK-6465][SQL] Fix serialization of GenericRowWithSchema using kryo #5191

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
marmbrus wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[SPARK-6465][SQL] Fix serialization of GenericRowWithSchema using kryo #5191

marmbrus wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

@marmbrus marmbrus commented Mar 25, 2015

No description provided.

@marmbrus marmbrus changed the title [SPARK-6465][SQL] Add no arg constructor to GenericRowWithSchema [SPARK-6465][SQL] Fix serialization of GenericRowWithSchema using kryo Mar 25, 2015
@rxin rxin mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2015
Closed
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 26, 2015

Test build #29190 has finished for PR 5191 at commit bb83522.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

liancheng commented Mar 26, 2015

LGTM

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2015
@marmbrus @liancheng
[SPARK-6465][SQL] Fix serialization of GenericRowWithSchema using kryo
8254996 
Author: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>

Closes #5191 from marmbrus/kryoRowsWithSchema and squashes the following commits:

bb83522 [Michael Armbrust] Fix serialization of GenericRowWithSchema using kryo
f914f16 [Michael Armbrust] Add no arg constructor to GenericRowWithSchema

(cherry picked from commit f88f51b)
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lian <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in f88f51b Mar 26, 2015
@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

liancheng commented Mar 26, 2015

Thanks, merged to master and 1.3.

@marmbrus marmbrus deleted the kryoRowsWithSchema branch August 3, 2015 22:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@marmbrus @SparkQA @liancheng