-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-47307][SQL][3.5] Add a config to optionally chunk base64 strings #47325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
...tor/connect/common/src/test/resources/query-tests/explain-results/function_base64.explain
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ | ||
| Project [base64(cast(g#0 as binary)) AS base64(g)#0] | ||
| Project [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Base64, StringType, encode, cast(g#0 as binary), false, BinaryType, BooleanType, true, true, true) AS base64(g)#0] | ||
| +- LocalRelation <empty>, [id#0L, a#0, b#0, d#0, e#0, f#0, g#0] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC, if we start to backport SPARK-47307, it will go to Apache Spark 3.4.4 together, right? In that case, I'm curious if 3.5.2 is correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. Got it. I saw this comment from Apache Spark 3.5.2 release manager, @yaooqinn .
If then, are we going to update these values from
masterandbranch-3.5when we do the release of Apache Spark 3.4.4? I'm fine if we are going to do in that way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @dongjoon-hyun.
Not related to this PR, maybe we shall add multiple fixed version in this field, such as
3.4.4, 3.5.2, 4.0.0There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Theoretically, it's possible, but it will enforce us to update all the existing configurations and documentations. So, we had better not to because it could be too much.