-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-47097][CONNECT][TESTS] Deflake interrupt tag at SparkSessionE2ESuite #45173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2024
Member
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM. Thank you for starting the investigation.
Member
Author
|
Merged to master. |
dongjoon-hyun
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
…` for `interrupt tag` test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow-up to increase `timeout` from `30s` to `1 minute` like the other timeouts of the same test case. - #45173 ### Why are the changes needed? To reduce the flakiness more. The following is the recent failure on `master` branch. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8944948827/job/24572965877 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8945375279/job/24574263993 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #46374 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-47097. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
LuciferYang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2024
…nterrupt tag` test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to disable a flaky test, `SparkSessionE2ESuite.interrupt tag`, temporarily. To re-enable this, SPARK-48139 is created as a blocker issue for 4.0.0. ### Why are the changes needed? This test case was added at `Apache Spark 3.5.0` but has been unstable unfortunately until now. - #42009 We tried to stabilize this test case before `Apache Spark 4.0.0-preview`. - #45173 - #46374 However, it's still flaky. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8962353911/job/24611130573 (Master, 2024-05-05) - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8948176536/job/24581022674 (Master, 2024-05-04) This PR aims to stablize CI first and to focus this flaky issue as a blocker level before going on `Spark Connect GA` in SPARK-48139 before Apache Spark 4.0.0. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #46396 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-48138. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
…nterrupt tag` test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to disable a flaky test, `SparkSessionE2ESuite.interrupt tag`, temporarily. To re-enable this, SPARK-48139 is created as a blocker issue for 4.0.0. ### Why are the changes needed? This test case was added at `Apache Spark 3.5.0` but has been unstable unfortunately until now. - #42009 We tried to stabilize this test case before `Apache Spark 4.0.0-preview`. - #45173 - #46374 However, it's still flaky. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8962353911/job/24611130573 (Master, 2024-05-05) - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8948176536/job/24581022674 (Master, 2024-05-04) This PR aims to stablize CI first and to focus this flaky issue as a blocker level before going on `Spark Connect GA` in SPARK-48139 before Apache Spark 4.0.0. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #46396 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-48138. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 8294c59) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to deflake increase interrupt tag at
SparkSessionE2ESuiteby:SparkSessionE2ESuite.Why are the changes needed?
To fix the flakiness:
https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/7959951623/job/21727929211
The test failed because the interruption took more than 20 seconds, and it launches too many tasks to run.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, test-only.
How was this patch tested?
CI in this PR should validate them. The flakiness can't easily be reproduced in my local.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.