-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-46586][SQL] Support s.c.immutable.ArraySeq as customCollectionCls in MapObjects
#44591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ionCls` in `MapObjects`
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: YangJie <[email protected]>
…Cls in MapObjects
...talyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ObjectExpressionsSuite.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…Cls in MapObjects
|
GA have passed, could you please update the PR description? @panbingkun |
Done. |
|
cc @cloud-fan @viirya @MaxGekk @dongjoon-hyun FYI |
| executeFuncOnCollection(input).foreach(builder += _) | ||
| mutable.ArraySeq.make(builder.result()) | ||
| } | ||
| case Some(cls) if classOf[immutable.ArraySeq[_]].isAssignableFrom(cls) => |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not related to this PR, but this MapObjects expression gets more and more complicated. Can we rewrite it with RuntimeReplacable using StaticInvoke/Invoke so that we can implement it with pure scala?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, let me give it a try.
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM.
|
Merged to master. Thank you, @panbingkun and @cloud-fan . |
viirya
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
| Row(ArrayBuffer(100))) | ||
|
|
||
| val myUdf2 = udf((a: immutable.ArraySeq[Int]) => | ||
| immutable.ArraySeq.unsafeWrapArray[Int](a.appended(5).appended(6).toArray)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
super nit: isn't it more common to use :+ to create new immutable collection with new elements?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, let me improve it.
…ionCls` in `MapObjects` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The pr aims to support `s.c.immutable.ArraySeq` as `customCollectionCls` in `MapObjects`. ### Why are the changes needed? Because `s.c.immutable.ArraySeq` is a commonly used type in Scala 2.13, we should support it. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, We support `s.c.immutable.ArraySeq` in `MapObjects`. ### How was this patch tested? - Add new UT: Added a new test for `ArraySeq` in UDFSuite; Also updated `ObjectExpressionsSuite` for `MapObjects`. - Pass GA. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#44591 from panbingkun/SPARK-46586. Lead-authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The pr is following up #44591. ### Why are the changes needed? Fix issues in comments. <img width="908" alt="image" src="https://github.com/apache/spark/assets/15246973/deec66a1-1bd1-44bc-9c16-f1fe8bbb14e8"> ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? - Pass GA. - Manually test. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #44702 from panbingkun/SPARK-46586_fix. Authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The pr aims to support
s.c.immutable.ArraySeqascustomCollectionClsinMapObjects.Why are the changes needed?
Because
s.c.immutable.ArraySeqis a commonly used type in Scala 2.13, we should support it.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, We support
s.c.immutable.ArraySeqinMapObjects.How was this patch tested?
ArraySeqin UDFSuite; Also updatedObjectExpressionsSuiteforMapObjects.Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.