[SPARK-45950][INFRA][CORE] Fix IvyTestUtils#createIvyDescriptor function and make common-utils module can run tests on GitHub Action
#43834
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR mainly does two things:
IvyTestUtils.scalathat was mistakenly deleted in SPARK-45506 | [SPARK-45506][CONNECT] Add ivy URI support to SparkConnect addArtifact #43354 to ensure that theivy.xmlfile generated byIvyTestUtils#createIvyDescriptoris complete. Before this PR, the generatedivy.xmlfile would missing the</ivy-module>end tag, which would cause two test cases inMavenUtilsSuiteto fail. We can reproduce the problem by executing thebuild/sbt "common-utils/test"command:sbt_test_goalsto theutilsmodule inmodules.pyto ensure that the unit tests in thecommon-utilsmodule will be verified by GitHub Action.Why are the changes needed?
Fix the failed test cases in
MavenUtilsSuiteand let GitHub Action verify the unit tests in thecommon-utilsmodule.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Monitor GA, the unit tests in the common-utils module should be run, and
MavenUtilsSuiteshould test successfully.Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No