Skip to content

Conversation

@pan3793
Copy link
Member

@pan3793 pan3793 commented Dec 13, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup of #38622, I just notice that the YarnClusterSchedulerBackend#stop missed calling super.stop().

Why are the changes needed?

Followup previous change, otherwise Spark may not shutdown properly on Yarn cluster mode.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, unreleased change.

How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

Copy link
Contributor

@tgravescs tgravescs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for catching this

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thank you, @pan3793 and @tgravescs .
Merged to mastser for Apache Spark 3.4.0.

beliefer pushed a commit to beliefer/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2022
… super.stop()

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup of apache#38622, I just notice that the `YarnClusterSchedulerBackend#stop` missed calling `super.stop()`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Followup previous change, otherwise Spark may not shutdown properly on Yarn cluster mode.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, unreleased change.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

Closes apache#39053 from pan3793/SPARK-39601-followup.

Authored-by: Cheng Pan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants