[SPARK-41017][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Respect the original Filter operator order #38684
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
wangyum
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2022
cloud-fan
commented
Nov 17, 2022
...re/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/V2ScanRelationPushDown.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…rces/v2/V2ScanRelationPushDown.scala
Contributor
Author
|
thanks for review, merging to master! |
SandishKumarHN
pushed a commit
to SandishKumarHN/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a followup of apache#38511 to fix a mistake: we should respect the original `Filter` operator order when re-constructing the query plan. ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? N/A Closes apache#38684 from cloud-fan/column-pruning. Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
beliefer
pushed a commit
to beliefer/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a followup of apache#38511 to fix a mistake: we should respect the original `Filter` operator order when re-constructing the query plan. ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? N/A Closes apache#38684 from cloud-fan/column-pruning. Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
beliefer
pushed a commit
to beliefer/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a followup of apache#38511 to fix a mistake: we should respect the original `Filter` operator order when re-constructing the query plan. ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? N/A Closes apache#38684 from cloud-fan/column-pruning. Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of #38511 to fix a mistake: we should respect the original
Filteroperator order when re-constructing the query plan.Why are the changes needed?
bug fix
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
N/A