Skip to content

Conversation

@pan3793
Copy link
Member

@pan3793 pan3793 commented Aug 4, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove unnecessary guava exclusion from jackson-module-scala

Why are the changes needed?

The exclusion added in SPARK-6149, the recent versions of jackson-module-scala does not depend on gauva any more, so we can remove this exclusion.

https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.fasterxml.jackson.module/jackson-module-scala_2.12/2.13.3

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Exsiting UT.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the BUILD label Aug 4, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@LuciferYang LuciferYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 LGTM

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@pan3793
Copy link
Member Author

pan3793 commented Oct 23, 2022

cc @wangyum, could u please take a look at this minor issue?

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Oct 24, 2022

Merged to master

@srowen srowen closed this in 363b853 Oct 24, 2022
SandishKumarHN pushed a commit to SandishKumarHN/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
…module-scala

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove unnecessary guava exclusion from jackson-module-scala

### Why are the changes needed?

The exclusion added in SPARK-6149, the recent versions of  jackson-module-scala does not depend on gauva any more, so we can remove this exclusion.

https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.fasterxml.jackson.module/jackson-module-scala_2.12/2.13.3

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Exsiting UT.

Closes apache#37405 from pan3793/SPARK-39977.

Authored-by: Cheng Pan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants