-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.3k
[SPARK-39057][SQL] Offset could work without Limit #36417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2db1f64
[SPARK-28330][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Remove logical GlobalLimitAndOffset
beliefer caaac4e
Update code
beliefer ddbfc0d
Update code
beliefer d9c0157
Update code
beliefer 48673ea
Support offset alone
beliefer fff48d0
Update code
beliefer e0873cd
Update code
beliefer 4aaa114
Update code
beliefer 1d22141
Update code
beliefer 6c282c6
Update code
beliefer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ abstract class Optimizer(catalogManager: CatalogManager) | |
| CollapseWindow, | ||
| CombineFilters, | ||
| EliminateLimits, | ||
| RewriteOffsets, | ||
| CombineUnions, | ||
| // Constant folding and strength reduction | ||
| OptimizeRepartition, | ||
|
|
@@ -673,7 +672,7 @@ object RemoveNoopUnion extends Rule[LogicalPlan] { | |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Pushes down [[LocalLimit]] beneath UNION ALL and joins. | ||
| * Pushes down [[LocalLimit]] beneath UNION ALL, OFFSET and joins. | ||
| */ | ||
| object LimitPushDown extends Rule[LogicalPlan] { | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -750,6 +749,11 @@ object LimitPushDown extends Rule[LogicalPlan] { | |
| Limit(le, Project(a.aggregateExpressions, LocalLimit(le, a.child))) | ||
| case Limit(le @ IntegerLiteral(1), p @ Project(_, a: Aggregate)) if a.groupOnly => | ||
| Limit(le, p.copy(child = Project(a.aggregateExpressions, LocalLimit(le, a.child)))) | ||
| // Merge offset value and limit value into LocalLimit and pushes down LocalLimit through Offset. | ||
| case LocalLimit(le, Offset(oe @ IntegerLiteral(offset), grandChild)) if offset > 0 => | ||
| Offset(oe, LocalLimit(Add(le, oe), grandChild)) | ||
| // Eliminate Offset if offset value equals 0. | ||
| case Offset(IntegerLiteral(0), child) => child | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We can add a new rule |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -1870,25 +1874,6 @@ object EliminateLimits extends Rule[LogicalPlan] { | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Rewrite [[Offset]] as [[GlobalLimitAndOffset]] or [[LocalLimit]], | ||
| * merging the expressions into one single expression. See [[Limit]] for more information | ||
| * about the difference between [[LocalLimit]] and [[GlobalLimit]]. | ||
| */ | ||
| object RewriteOffsets extends Rule[LogicalPlan] { | ||
| def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform { | ||
| case GlobalLimit(le, Offset(oe, grandChild)) => | ||
| GlobalLimitAndOffset(le, oe, grandChild) | ||
| case localLimit @ LocalLimit(le, Offset(oe, grandChild)) => | ||
| val offset = oe.eval().asInstanceOf[Int] | ||
| if (offset == 0) { | ||
| localLimit.withNewChildren(Seq(grandChild)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Offset(oe, LocalLimit(Add(le, oe), grandChild)) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Check if there any cartesian products between joins of any type in the optimized plan tree. | ||
| * Throw an error if a cartesian product is found without an explicit cross join specified. | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the pushdown is correct even if
offset == 0. We don't needif offset > 0