-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-37145][K8S] Add support for extending user feature steps with configuration #34924
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about how we could avoid reflections here and my idea is the following:
KubernetesFeatureConfigStepwith a new methoddef init(config: KubernetesConf) {}KubernetesDriverFeatureConfigStep/KubernetesExecutorFeatureConfigStep) where theinitacceptsKubernetesDriverConfandKubernetesExecutorConfrespectively. Theinitin the derived classes this way is not overriding the init ofKubernetesFeatureConfigStep. So we cannot create a commonloadFeatureStepwhereKubernetesConfis passed but it can be a function with generic parameter.And finally we can extend the doc of
KUBERNETES_DRIVER_POD_FEATURE_STEPSandKUBERNETES_EXECUTOR_POD_FEATURE_STEPSto mention those two specific traits.This way the custom feature step's API will contain a clue that configs can be used to initialize.
WDYT?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Yes, it's a little bit complex and some hack taste, but the advantage would be same experience and interface with native feature step, and init way is simple, but perhaps bring some different interface for user.
If I understand correctly your idea, this #35345 migth be the alternative way you mentioend. Could you take a look on it? @attilapiros
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Today I was busy with some internal stuffs so I just had time to quickly scan it and although it looks better I will have some comments but only on Monday...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Much thanks for your help!