[SPARK-36336][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Mark exception private[spark]

[Peng-Lei]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Mark the exception added private[spark]
according comments

Why are the changes needed?

comments

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

existed ut testcase

[dongjoon-hyun]

cc @cloud-fan and @HyukjinKwon

[gengliangwang]

Do we need to make SparkException private as well, regarding the comment #33824 (comment)

cc @karenfeng

[cloud-fan]

SparkException is not newly added, I'm a bit worried about changing it.

[gengliangwang]

SparkException is not newly added, I'm a bit worried about changing it.

Right, let's leave it as it is.

[cloud-fan]

ok to test

[SparkQA]

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/47336/

[SparkQA]

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/47336/

[SparkQA]

Test build #142834 has finished for PR 33856 at commit d59ccd7.

• This patch fails from timeout after a configured wait of 500m.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[HyukjinKwon]

retest this please

[SparkQA]

Kubernetes integration test unable to build dist.

exiting with code: 1
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/47347/

[SparkQA]

Test build #142845 has finished for PR 33856 at commit d59ccd7.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[HyukjinKwon]

Merged to master.