Skip to content

Conversation

@sarutak
Copy link
Member

@sarutak sarutak commented Dec 13, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes a better solution for the R build failure on GitHub Actions.
The issue is solved in #30737 but I noticed the following two things.

  • We can use the latest usethis if we install additional libraries on the GitHub Actions environment.
  • For tests on AppVeyor, usethis is not necessary, so I partially revert the previous change.

Why are the changes needed?

For more simple solution.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Confirmed on GitHub Actions and AppVeyor on my account.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the INFRA label Dec 13, 2020
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 14, 2020

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/37331/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 14, 2020

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/37331/

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thanks, @sarutak .
Linter and AppVeyor passed.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-33757][INFRA][R][FOLLOWUP] Provide more simple solution for SPARK-33757 [SPARK-33757][INFRA][R][FOLLOWUP] Provide more simple solution Dec 14, 2020
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes a better solution for the R build failure on GitHub Actions.
The issue is solved in #30737 but I noticed the following two things.

* We can use the latest `usethis` if we install additional libraries on the GitHub Actions environment.
* For tests on AppVeyor, `usethis` is not necessary, so I partially revert the previous change.

### Why are the changes needed?

For more simple solution.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Confirmed on GitHub Actions and AppVeyor on my account.

Closes #30753 from sarutak/followup-SPARK-33757.

Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b135db3)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes a better solution for the R build failure on GitHub Actions.
The issue is solved in #30737 but I noticed the following two things.

* We can use the latest `usethis` if we install additional libraries on the GitHub Actions environment.
* For tests on AppVeyor, `usethis` is not necessary, so I partially revert the previous change.

### Why are the changes needed?

For more simple solution.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Confirmed on GitHub Actions and AppVeyor on my account.

Closes #30753 from sarutak/followup-SPARK-33757.

Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b135db3)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes a better solution for the R build failure on GitHub Actions.
The issue is solved in #30737 but I noticed the following two things.

* We can use the latest `usethis` if we install additional libraries on the GitHub Actions environment.
* For tests on AppVeyor, `usethis` is not necessary, so I partially revert the previous change.

### Why are the changes needed?

For more simple solution.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Confirmed on GitHub Actions and AppVeyor on my account.

Closes #30753 from sarutak/followup-SPARK-33757.

Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b135db3)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Merged to master/3.1/3.0/2.4.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 14, 2020

Test build #132729 has finished for PR 30753 at commit 28d164b.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@sarutak sarutak deleted the followup-SPARK-33757 branch June 4, 2021 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants