-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-32449][ML][PySpark] Add summary to MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel #29250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Test build #126588 has finished for PR 29250 at commit
|
|
Test build #126589 has finished for PR 29250 at commit
|
| 'NaiveBayes', 'NaiveBayesModel', | ||
| 'MultilayerPerceptronClassifier', 'MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel', | ||
| 'MultilayerPerceptronClassificationSummary', | ||
| 'MultilayerPerceptronClassificationTrainingSummary', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@huaxingao, are these going to be documented? Might be good to list at pyspark.ml.rst too if so. The documentation PR (#29188) was merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HyukjinKwon updated pyspark.ml.rst. Thanks!
srowen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks generally OK to me
|
Test build #126663 has finished for PR 29250 at commit
|
|
Merged to master |
|
Thanks! |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add training summary to MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel...
Why are the changes needed?
so that user can get the training process status, such as loss value of each iteration and total iteration number.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel.summary
MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel.evaluate
How was this patch tested?
new tests