Skip to content

Conversation

@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The optimizedPlan in IncrementalExecution should also be scoped in withActive.

Why are the changes needed?

Follow-up of SPARK-30798 for the Streaming side.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

cc @cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 28, 2020

Test build #124589 has finished for PR 28936 at commit 5ca38fd.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 28, 2020

Test build #124595 has finished for PR 28936 at commit 5ca38fd.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @xuanyuanking . BTW, since Apache Spark 3.0.0 is already released and this patch only is applicable for Apache Spark 3.0.1. So, could you file a new JIRA for this PR? Otherwise, we will lose the traceability for this patch.

Copy link
Contributor

@cloud-fan cloud-fan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, let's create a new JIRA ticket

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-30798][SS][FOLLOW-UP] Scope Session.active in IncrementalExecution [SPARK-32126][SS] Scope Session.active in IncrementalExecution Jun 29, 2020
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @xuanyuanking and @cloud-fan . I created SPARK-32126 and update the title.
Merged to master/3.0.

dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The `optimizedPlan` in IncrementalExecution should also be scoped in `withActive`.

### Why are the changes needed?

Follow-up of SPARK-30798 for the Streaming side.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.

Closes #28936 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30798-follow.

Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f944603)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry for the late.
Agree we need a new Jira for this. I should create it by myself, thanks for your help! @dongjoon-hyun

@xuanyuanking xuanyuanking deleted the SPARK-30798-follow branch June 30, 2020 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants