[SPARK-31932][SQL][TESTS] Add date/timestamp benchmarks for HiveResult.hiveResultString()#28757
Closed
MaxGekk wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-31932][SQL][TESTS] Add date/timestamp benchmarks for HiveResult.hiveResultString()#28757MaxGekk wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
HiveResult.hiveResultString()#28757MaxGekk wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@cloud-fan @juliuszsompolski @HyukjinKwon Please, review this PR. |
MaxGekk
changed the title
toHiveStringHiveResult.hiveResultString()
|
Test build #123646 has finished for PR 28757 at commit
|
Contributor
|
I'm merging it to 3.0 as well, so that it's easier to compare the perf between 3.0 and 3.1 in the future. thanks, merging to master/3.0! |
cloud-fan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2020
…lt.hiveResultString()` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Add benchmarks for `HiveResult.hiveResultString()/toHiveString()` to measure throughput of `toHiveString` for the date/timestamp types: - java.sql.Date/Timestamp - java.time.Instant - java.time.LocalDate Benchmark results were generated in the environment: | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge | | AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) | | Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10 | ### Why are the changes needed? To detect perf regressions of `toHiveString` in the future. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? By running `DateTimeBenchmark` and check dataset content. Closes #28757 from MaxGekk/benchmark-toHiveString. Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com> (cherry picked from commit ddd8d5f) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add benchmarks for
HiveResult.hiveResultString()/toHiveString()to measure throughput oftoHiveStringfor the date/timestamp types:Benchmark results were generated in the environment:
Why are the changes needed?
To detect perf regressions of
toHiveStringin the future.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
By running
DateTimeBenchmarkand check dataset content.