Skip to content

Conversation

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Member

@MaxGekk MaxGekk commented May 6, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In PR, I propose to modify two tests of ParquetIOSuite:

to check non-vectorized Parquet reader together with vectorized reader.

Why are the changes needed?

To improve test coverage and make sure that non-vectorized reader behaves similar to the vectorized reader.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

By running PaquetIOSuite:

$ ./build/sbt "test:testOnly *ParquetIOSuite"

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Member Author

MaxGekk commented May 6, 2020

@dongjoon-hyun @HyukjinKwon @cloud-fan Please, take a look it if you have time.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 6, 2020

Test build #122378 has finished for PR 28466 at commit a34745f.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

can you fix conflicts?

…rebase-ParquetIOSuite

# Conflicts:
#	sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetIOSuite.scala
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2020

Test build #122391 has finished for PR 28466 at commit 7bbc740.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
  • instr.logWarning(s\"All labels belong to a single class and fitIntercept=false. It's a \" +

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Member Author

MaxGekk commented May 7, 2020

jenkins, retest this, please

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

It's a test only change and the touched test suite passes. I'm merging it to master/3.0, thanks!

cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2020
…er while date/timestamp rebasing

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PR, I propose to modify two tests of `ParquetIOSuite`:
- SPARK-31159: rebasing timestamps in write
- SPARK-31159: rebasing dates in write

to check non-vectorized Parquet reader together with vectorized reader.

### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage and make sure that non-vectorized reader behaves similar to the vectorized reader.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
By running `PaquetIOSuite`:
```
$ ./build/sbt "test:testOnly *ParquetIOSuite"
```

Closes #28466 from MaxGekk/test-novec-rebase-ParquetIOSuite.

Authored-by: Max Gekk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 272d229)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in 272d229 May 7, 2020
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2020

Test build #122395 has finished for PR 28466 at commit 7bbc740.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
  • instr.logWarning(s\"All labels belong to a single class and fitIntercept=false. It's a \" +

@MaxGekk MaxGekk deleted the test-novec-rebase-ParquetIOSuite branch June 5, 2020 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants