Skip to content

Conversation

@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Follow up for #27267, reset the status changed in SQLExecution.withThreadLocalCaptured.

Why are the changes needed?

For code safety.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing UT.

(cherry picked from commit a6b91d2)

….withThreadLocalCaptured

Follow up for apache#27267, reset the status changed in SQLExecution.withThreadLocalCaptured.

For code safety.

No.

Existing UT.

Closes apache#27516 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30556-follow.

(cherry picked from commit a6b91d2)
@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 19, 2020

Test build #118664 has finished for PR 27633 at commit 936c5b3.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 19, 2020

Test build #118667 has finished for PR 27633 at commit 936c5b3.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merging to 2.4!

cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2020
…tion withThreadLocalCaptured

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up for #27267, reset the status changed in SQLExecution.withThreadLocalCaptured.

### Why are the changes needed?
For code safety.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.

(cherry picked from commit a6b91d2)

Closes #27633 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30556-backport.

Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this Feb 19, 2020
@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

@xuanyuanking xuanyuanking deleted the SPARK-30556-backport branch February 20, 2020 04:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants