Skip to content

Conversation

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor

@vidaha vidaha commented Oct 1, 2014

No description provided.

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 1, 2014

@marmbrus

I would expect some of these test cases to fail...any idea why it isn't?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 1, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2621 at commit b013cab.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 1, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2621 at commit b013cab.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21155/

@vidaha vidaha changed the title Add tests for different UDF's [SPARK-3752][SQL]: Add tests for different UDF's Oct 1, 2014
@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 1, 2014

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 1, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2621 at commit 07de8c2.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 1, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2621 at commit 07de8c2.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • public class UDFIntegerToString extends UDF
    • public class UDFListListInt extends UDF
    • public class UDFStringString extends UDF
    • case class IntegerCaseClass(i: Int)
    • case class ListListIntCaseClass(lli: Seq[Tuple3[Int, Int, Int]])
    • case class StringCaseClass(s: String)

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21156/

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 1, 2014

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 1, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2621 at commit 1ba46ef.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 1, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2621 at commit 1ba46ef.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • println(s"Failed to load main class $childMainClass.")

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21162/

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 2, 2014

Please hold off on merging - I want to add more cases to this test.

@vidaha vidaha force-pushed the vida/SPARK-3752 branch 2 times, most recently from 2b1854e to af64454 Compare October 3, 2014 19:56
@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 3, 2014

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 3, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2621 at commit af64454.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 3, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2621 at commit af64454.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21268/Test FAILed.

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 3, 2014

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 3, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2621 at commit 1689975.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 3, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2621 at commit 1689975.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21269/Test FAILed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use the idomatic syntax for tuple types: Seq[(Int, Int, Int)]

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 6, 2014

okay to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 6, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2621 at commit d7fdbbc.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 6, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2621 at commit d7fdbbc.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • public class UDFIntegerToString extends UDF
    • public class UDFListListInt extends UDF
    • public class UDFListString extends UDF
    • public class UDFStringString extends UDF
    • public class UDFTwoListList extends UDF
    • case class IntegerCaseClass(i: Int)
    • case class ListListIntCaseClass(lli: Seq[(Int, Int, Int)])
    • case class StringCaseClass(s: String)
    • case class ListStringCaseClass(l: Seq[String])
    • class HiveUdfSuite extends QueryTest

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21337/Test PASSed.

@vidaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

vidaha commented Oct 6, 2014

@marmbrus - ready for another round - merge or let me know what to change.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b77a02f Oct 9, 2014
@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Oct 9, 2014

Thanks @vidaha :)

merged to master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants