[SPARK-27905][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add prettyNames.#25501
Closed
ueshin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-27905][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Add prettyNames.#25501ueshin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
ueshin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
srowen
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2019
Contributor
|
LGTM |
kiszk
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2019
|
Test build #109361 has finished for PR 25501 at commit
|
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2019
Member
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1, LGTM. Merged to master.
Thank you, @ueshin , @srowen , @dilipbiswal , @kiszk , @viirya !
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up of #24761 which added a higher-order function
ArrayForAll.The PR mistakenly removed the
prettyNamefromArrayExistsand forgot to add it toArrayForAll.Why are the changes needed?
This reverts the
prettyNameback toArrayExistsnot to affect explained plans, and adds it toArrayForAllto clarify theprettyNameas the same as the expressions around.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.