[SPARK-26555][SQL][BRANCH-2.4] make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe#24913
Closed
JoshRosen wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.4from
Closed
[SPARK-26555][SQL][BRANCH-2.4] make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe#24913JoshRosen wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.4from
JoshRosen wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.4from
Conversation
Make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe by adding a lock. There is a thread safety bug in the <:< operator in all versions of scala (scala/bug#10766). Existing tests and a new one for the new subtype checking function. Closes apache#24085 from mwlon/SPARK-26555. Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Contributor
Author
|
This was not a clean cherry-pick: there were a significant number of conflicts in |
|
Test build #106685 has finished for PR 24913 at commit
|
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2019
viirya
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2019
JoshRosen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2019
…thread safe This is a Spark 2.4.x backport of #24085. Original description follows below: ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe by adding a lock. There is a thread safety bug in the <:< operator in all versions of scala (scala/bug#10766). ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests and a new one for the new subtype checking function. Closes #24913 from JoshRosen/joshrosen/SPARK-26555-branch-2.4-backport. Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu> Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <rosenville@gmail.com>
rluta
pushed a commit
to rluta/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2019
…thread safe This is a Spark 2.4.x backport of apache#24085. Original description follows below: ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe by adding a lock. There is a thread safety bug in the <:< operator in all versions of scala (scala/bug#10766). ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests and a new one for the new subtype checking function. Closes apache#24913 from JoshRosen/joshrosen/SPARK-26555-branch-2.4-backport. Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu> Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <rosenville@gmail.com>
kai-chi
pushed a commit
to kai-chi/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2019
…thread safe This is a Spark 2.4.x backport of apache#24085. Original description follows below: ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe by adding a lock. There is a thread safety bug in the <:< operator in all versions of scala (scala/bug#10766). ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests and a new one for the new subtype checking function. Closes apache#24913 from JoshRosen/joshrosen/SPARK-26555-branch-2.4-backport. Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu> Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <rosenville@gmail.com>
igreenfield
pushed a commit
to axiomsl/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2019
…thread safe This is a Spark 2.4.x backport of apache#24085. Original description follows below: ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe by adding a lock. There is a thread safety bug in the <:< operator in all versions of scala (scala/bug#10766). ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests and a new one for the new subtype checking function. Closes apache#24913 from JoshRosen/joshrosen/SPARK-26555-branch-2.4-backport. Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu> Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <rosenville@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a Spark 2.4.x backport of #24085. Original description follows below:
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make ScalaReflection subtype checking thread safe by adding a lock. There is a thread safety bug in the <:< operator in all versions of scala (scala/bug#10766).
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and a new one for the new subtype checking function.