-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-25611][SPARK-25612][SQL][TESTS] Improve test run time of CompressionCodecSuite #22641
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d7ffa6
[SPARK-25611][SPARK-25622] Improve test run time of CompressionCodecS…
dilipbiswal 01f1f97
Remove redundant loops
dilipbiswal 361f5f7
Improve time further - reduce codec combinations to 3
dilipbiswal 3dbc5dc
fix1
dilipbiswal fdab980
Code review
dilipbiswal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's see, the two tests before were taking 2:20 and 0:47. Now they take about 0:43 each. That's clearly a win in the first case, not much in the second, as expected. I'm OK with this as an improvement, myself.
I wonder if we need all 8 combinations in this triply nested loop though. Incidentally it could be written more easily as such, but I know this was existing code:
for (isPartitioned <- Seq(true, false); convertMetastore <- Seq(true, false); usingCTAS <- Seq(true, false)) {@fjh100456 what do you think? is it important to test all combinations, or could we get away with setting all true and all false without much of any loss here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This combination provides different test scenarios,they are not quite the same on writing data and table property passing, all of which have the potential to affect the test results. So I think it's necessary to keep.