Skip to content

Conversation

@jiangxb1987
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Previously in TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite the SparkSession will not get recycled when the test suite finishes.

How was this patch tested?

N/A


protected override def afterAll() = {
SQLConf.get.setConf(SQLConf.LIMIT_FLAT_GLOBAL_LIMIT, originalLimitFlatGlobalLimit)
super.afterAll()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@viirya
Copy link
Member

viirya commented Sep 4, 2018

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 4, 2018

Test build #95674 has finished for PR 22330 at commit 0b01066.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@gatorsmile gatorsmile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Thanks! Merged to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 3aa6028 Sep 4, 2018
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This goes to revert sequential PRs based on some discussion and comments at #16677 (comment).

#22344
#22330
#22239
#16677

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #22481 from viirya/revert-SPARK-19355-1.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 89671a2)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This goes to revert sequential PRs based on some discussion and comments at #16677 (comment).

#22344
#22330
#22239
#16677

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #22481 from viirya/revert-SPARK-19355-1.

Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants