Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1092,6 +1092,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
.createWithDefault(SHUFFLE_SPILL_NUM_ELEMENTS_FORCE_SPILL_THRESHOLD.defaultValue.get)

val SHUFFLED_JOIN_CHILDREN_PARTITIONING_DETECTION =
buildConf("spark.sql.shuffledJoin.childrenPartitioningDetection")
.internal()
.doc("When true, sort merge join and shuffled hash join will detect children data " +
"partitioning to avoid shuffle, it is helpful when join keys are a super-set of " +
"bucket keys")
.booleanConf
.createWithDefault(true)

val SORT_MERGE_JOIN_EXEC_BUFFER_IN_MEMORY_THRESHOLD =
buildConf("spark.sql.sortMergeJoinExec.buffer.in.memory.threshold")
.internal()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1669,6 +1678,9 @@ class SQLConf extends Serializable with Logging {

def windowExecBufferSpillThreshold: Int = getConf(WINDOW_EXEC_BUFFER_SPILL_THRESHOLD)

def shuffledJoinChildrenPartitioningDetection: Boolean =
getConf(SHUFFLED_JOIN_CHILDREN_PARTITIONING_DETECTION)

def sortMergeJoinExecBufferInMemoryThreshold: Int =
getConf(SORT_MERGE_JOIN_EXEC_BUFFER_IN_MEMORY_THRESHOLD)

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/

package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins

import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.physical.{ClusteredDistribution, Distribution, HashClusteredDistribution, HashPartitioning}
import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.{FileSourceScanExec, SparkPlan}
import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec

object JoinUtils {
private def avoidShuffleIfPossible(
joinKeys: Seq[Expression],
expressions: Seq[Expression],
leftKeys: Seq[Expression],
rightKeys: Seq[Expression]): Seq[Distribution] = {
val indices = expressions.map(x => joinKeys.indexWhere(_.semanticEquals(x)))
HashClusteredDistribution(indices.map(leftKeys(_))) ::
HashClusteredDistribution(indices.map(rightKeys(_))) :: Nil
}

def requiredChildDistributionForShuffledJoin(
partitioningDetection: Boolean,
leftKeys: Seq[Expression],
rightKeys: Seq[Expression],
left: SparkPlan,
right: SparkPlan): Seq[Distribution] = {
if (!partitioningDetection) {
return HashClusteredDistribution(leftKeys) :: HashClusteredDistribution(rightKeys) :: Nil
}

val leftPartitioning = left.outputPartitioning
val rightPartitioning = right.outputPartitioning

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is my biggest concern. Currently Spark adds shuffle with a rule, so we can't always get the children partitioning precisely. We implemented a similar feature in EnsureRequirements.reorderJoinPredicates, which is hacky and we should improve the framework before adding more features like this.

@yucai yucai Oct 23, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cloud-fan in this PR, requiredChildDistribution is always re-calculated each time it is invoked, could it be more precise than EnsureRequirements.reorderJoinPredicates

This kind of bucketjoin is common, do we have a plan to improve the framework in 3.0?

leftPartitioning match {
case HashPartitioning(leftExpressions, _)
if leftPartitioning.satisfies(ClusteredDistribution(leftKeys)) =>
avoidShuffleIfPossible(leftKeys, leftExpressions, leftKeys, rightKeys)

case _ => rightPartitioning match {
case HashPartitioning(rightExpressions, _)
if rightPartitioning.satisfies(ClusteredDistribution(rightKeys)) =>
avoidShuffleIfPossible(rightKeys, rightExpressions, leftKeys, rightKeys)

case _ =>
HashClusteredDistribution(leftKeys) :: HashClusteredDistribution(rightKeys) :: Nil
}
}
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -45,8 +45,10 @@ case class ShuffledHashJoinExec(
"buildTime" -> SQLMetrics.createTimingMetric(sparkContext, "time to build hash map"),
"avgHashProbe" -> SQLMetrics.createAverageMetric(sparkContext, "avg hash probe"))

override def requiredChildDistribution: Seq[Distribution] =
HashClusteredDistribution(leftKeys) :: HashClusteredDistribution(rightKeys) :: Nil
override def requiredChildDistribution: Seq[Distribution] = {
JoinUtils.requiredChildDistributionForShuffledJoin(
conf.shuffledJoinChildrenPartitioningDetection, leftKeys, rightKeys, left, right)
}

private def buildHashedRelation(iter: Iterator[InternalRow]): HashedRelation = {
val buildDataSize = longMetric("buildDataSize")
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77,8 +77,10 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
s"${getClass.getSimpleName} should not take $x as the JoinType")
}

override def requiredChildDistribution: Seq[Distribution] =
HashClusteredDistribution(leftKeys) :: HashClusteredDistribution(rightKeys) :: Nil
override def requiredChildDistribution: Seq[Distribution] = {
JoinUtils.requiredChildDistributionForShuffledJoin(
conf.shuffledJoinChildrenPartitioningDetection, leftKeys, rightKeys, left, right)
}

override def outputOrdering: Seq[SortOrder] = joinType match {
// For inner join, orders of both sides keys should be kept.
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -408,16 +408,26 @@ abstract class BucketedReadSuite extends QueryTest with SQLTestUtils {
)
}

// Enable it after fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12704
ignore("avoid shuffle when join keys are a super-set of bucket keys") {
val bucketSpec = Some(BucketSpec(8, Seq("i"), Nil))
val bucketedTableTestSpecLeft = BucketedTableTestSpec(bucketSpec, expectedShuffle = false)
val bucketedTableTestSpecRight = BucketedTableTestSpec(bucketSpec, expectedShuffle = false)
testBucketing(
bucketedTableTestSpecLeft = bucketedTableTestSpecLeft,
bucketedTableTestSpecRight = bucketedTableTestSpecRight,
joinCondition = joinCondition(Seq("i", "j"))
)
test("avoid shuffle when join keys are a super-set of bucket keys") {
Seq("i", "j").foreach { bucketColumn =>
val bucketSpec = Some(BucketSpec(8, Seq(s"$bucketColumn"), Nil))

val bucketedTableTestSpecLeft1 = BucketedTableTestSpec(bucketSpec, expectedShuffle = false)
val bucketedTableTestSpecRight1 = BucketedTableTestSpec(bucketSpec, expectedShuffle = false)
testBucketing(
bucketedTableTestSpecLeft = bucketedTableTestSpecLeft1,
bucketedTableTestSpecRight = bucketedTableTestSpecRight1,
joinCondition = joinCondition(Seq("i", "j"))
)

val bucketedTableTestSpecLeft2 = BucketedTableTestSpec(bucketSpec, expectedShuffle = false)
val bucketedTableTestSpecRight2 = BucketedTableTestSpec(None, expectedShuffle = true)
testBucketing(
bucketedTableTestSpecLeft = bucketedTableTestSpecLeft2,
bucketedTableTestSpecRight = bucketedTableTestSpecRight2,
joinCondition = joinCondition(Seq("i", "j"))
)
}
}

test("only shuffle one side when join bucketed table and non-bucketed table") {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -647,8 +657,10 @@ abstract class BucketedReadSuite extends QueryTest with SQLTestUtils {
"partitioning columns") {

// join predicates is a super set of child's partitioning columns
val bucketedTableTestSpec1 =
BucketedTableTestSpec(Some(BucketSpec(8, Seq("i", "j"), Seq("i", "j"))), numPartitions = 1)
val bucketedTableTestSpec1 = BucketedTableTestSpec(
Some(BucketSpec(8, Seq("i", "j"), Seq("i", "j"))),
numPartitions = 1,
expectedShuffle = false)
testBucketing(
bucketedTableTestSpecLeft = bucketedTableTestSpec1,
bucketedTableTestSpecRight = bucketedTableTestSpec1,
Expand Down