-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.3k
[SPARK-23598][SQL] Make methods in BufferedRowIterator public to avoid runtime error for a large query #20779
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{IntegerType, StringType, StructType} | |
|
|
||
| class WholeStageCodegenSuite extends QueryTest with SharedSQLContext { | ||
|
|
||
| import testImplicits._ | ||
|
|
||
| test("range/filter should be combined") { | ||
| val df = spark.range(10).filter("id = 1").selectExpr("id + 1") | ||
| val plan = df.queryExecution.executedPlan | ||
|
|
@@ -307,4 +309,47 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite extends QueryTest with SharedSQLContext { | |
| // a different query can result in codegen cache miss, that's by design | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("SPARK-23598: Avoid compilation error with a lot of aggregation operations") { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's not a compilation but a runtime error. maybe better say: |
||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.SHUFFLE_PARTITIONS.key -> "1") { | ||
| val df = Seq((8, "bat"), (15, "mouse"), (5, "horse")).toDF("age", "name") | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can we do this with a loop? |
||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")) | ||
| .groupBy("name").agg(avg("age").alias("age")).limit(1) | ||
| assert(df.collect() === Array(Row("bat", 8.0))) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Although we added the test, should we also add a short sentence that said this is public so inner classes can also access it?