Skip to content

Conversation

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Simplifies the test cases that were added in the PR #18270.

How was this patch tested?

N/A

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member Author

cc @jiangxb1987 @cloud-fan

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 21, 2017

Test build #82943 has finished for PR 19546 at commit 35b07e2.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 21, 2017

Test build #82945 has finished for PR 19546 at commit 35b07e2.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

})
}

test("SPARK-8976 Wrong Result for Rollup #1") {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit, do we need to keep SPARK-21055 in the test case name here, too?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is fine. We do not have such a rule.

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks! Merged to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in a763607 Oct 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants