Skip to content

Conversation

@nahoj
Copy link
Contributor

@nahoj nahoj commented Jul 26, 2017

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jul 26, 2017

Can you have a look for similar typos, or others in this file? we encourage people to submit more than just one minor typo fix in a PR if possible

@nahoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

nahoj commented Jul 26, 2017

Sorry, I don't have time to proof-read the docs, I just saw this one typo as it is in the summary of this much-used class.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 28, 2017

Test build #3856 has finished for PR 18738 at commit dd2eb6b.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 28, 2017

Test build #3857 has finished for PR 18738 at commit dd2eb6b.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 28, 2017

Test build #3859 has finished for PR 18738 at commit dd2eb6b.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jul 28, 2017

Meh, these are spurious failures and can't be due to the typo fix. I'll merge.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 0ef9fe6 Jul 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants