-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.3k
[SPARK-21530] Update description of spark.shuffle.maxChunksBeingTransferred. #18735
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -636,6 +636,8 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also available, and may be useful | |
| <td>Long.MAX_VALUE</td> | ||
| <td> | ||
| The max number of chunks allowed to being transferred at the same time on shuffle service. | ||
| Note that new coming connections will be closed when the max number is hit. Client should | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. change to say: allowed to be transferred new coming should be new incoming. Perhaps we could clarify a bit because Spark has a built in retry mechanism. Could we rephrase to something like: The client will retry according to the shuffle retry configs (see spark.shuffle.io.maxRetries and spark.shuffle.io.retryWait), if those limits are reached the task will fail with fetch failure.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, this is much better. |
||
| have retry mechanism, otherwise it will end up with fetch failure. | ||
| </td> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| <tr> | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same comment as below