-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-20620][TEST]Improve some unit tests for NullExpressionsSuite and TypeCoercionSuite #17880
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test is part of the test case test("coalesce casts") in TypeCoercionSuite. If you want, you can improve that test case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The same for this. It is being covered by the test case test("type coercion for If") in TypeCoercionSuite. If you want, you can improve that test case.
|
@gatorsmile thanks,l will do it. |
c75c36b to
3f99750
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I guess this should be longLit )
|
Test build #3699 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
|
I have modify |
|
Test build #3731 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
|
retest this please |
|
LGTM pending Jenkins. |
|
Test build #77507 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
|
Test passed, thanks. @gatorsmile |
|
retest this please |
|
Test build #77871 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
…and TypeCoercionSuite ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? add more datatype for some unit tests ## How was this patch tested? unit tests Author: liuxian <[email protected]> Closes apache#17880 from 10110346/wip_lx_0506.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add more datatype for some unit tests
How was this patch tested?
unit tests