Skip to content

[SPARK-20283][SQL] Add preOptimizationBatches#17595

Closed
rxin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
rxin:SPARK-20283
Closed

[SPARK-20283][SQL] Add preOptimizationBatches#17595
rxin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
rxin:SPARK-20283

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Apr 10, 2017

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We currently have postHocOptimizationBatches, but not preOptimizationBatches. This patch adds preOptimizationBatches so the optimizer debugging extensions are symmetric.

How was this patch tested?

N/A

@hvanhovell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM - pending jenkins.

@SparkQA
Copy link
Copy Markdown

SparkQA commented Apr 10, 2017

Test build #75671 has finished for PR 17595 at commit 263dc68.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

rxin commented Apr 10, 2017

Merging this since as long as it compiles the change should be fine.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 379b0b0 Apr 10, 2017
peter-toth pushed a commit to peter-toth/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently have postHocOptimizationBatches, but not preOptimizationBatches. This patch adds preOptimizationBatches so the optimizer debugging extensions are symmetric.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes apache#17595 from rxin/SPARK-20283.
@ajithme
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ajithme commented Sep 3, 2019

@rxin @srowen @dongjoon-hyun there is no way to plugin a preOptimizationBatches to a spark session. But postHocOptimizationBatches and experimentalOptimizations can be. Do we plan to expose similar one for preOptimizationBatches .? Please suggest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants