Skip to content

Conversation

@wangmiao1981
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up PR of #16800

When doing SPARK-19456, we found that "" should be consider a NULL column name and should not be set. aggregationDepth should be exposed as an expert parameter.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 16, 2017

Test build #72965 has finished for PR 16945 at commit 70a8bb7.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@wangmiao1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @felixcheung

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member

could you add some tests (I don't think we need one for each) that the weight col is set properly?

@wangmiao1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will add tests. Now I am looking for dataset other than iris to be used in the document.

@wangmiao1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

I add a test of weightCol for spark.logit.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 17, 2017

Test build #73043 has finished for PR 16945 at commit 0e94467.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@wangmiao1981
Copy link
Contributor Author

@felixcheung I have made suggested changes. Thanks!

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member

merged to master

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 1f86e79 Feb 22, 2017
Yunni pushed a commit to Yunni/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
…ed for some SparkR APIs

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up PR of apache#16800

When doing SPARK-19456, we found that "" should be consider a NULL column name and should not be set. aggregationDepth should be exposed as an expert parameter.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.

Author: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Closes apache#16945 from wangmiao1981/svc.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants