-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.2k
[SPARK-19443][SQL] The function to generate constraints takes too long when the query plan grows continuously #16785
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b4e514a
Improve the code to generate constraints.
viirya 8c98a5c
Use parallel collection to improve the function.
viirya 1b9c561
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into improve-constrain…
viirya 278c31c
Revert parallel collection approach. Reduce aliased constraints.
viirya File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we using a custom task support instead of the default (which uses the global fork-join executor)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do they have the same parallelism level? BTW, I saw the parallel collection used in other places in Spark all take custom task support.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whether they do or not depends on the implementation of the default task support. But even if they use the same level of parallelism, they're distinct executors. Which means they won't share a common thread pool or task queue. I don't know why Spark would use custom task support in other places. It may be to avoid engaging all of the CPU cores on the host machine. But then it seems more efficient for Spark to have its own global task support.