-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-17241][SparkR][MLlib] SparkR spark.glm should have configurable regularization parameter #14856
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
[SPARK-17241][SparkR][MLlib] SparkR spark.glm should have configurable regularization parameter #14856
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6417049
[SPARK-17241] add configurable regularization parameter
keypointt c8bdd3b
[SPARK-17241] change param order
keypointt 492f29f
[SPARK-17241] docs parameter order should be the same as in function()
keypointt dd7cb82
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-17241
keypointt 39820a4
[SPARK-17241] add sanity check
keypointt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How was this number computed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh I just check the output of model stats
maybe there is a better way to test it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember it should match the result of
glmnet? Perhaps you can try the same example there or take a look at https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala#L307There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
though it's very likely that the result would not change :)