Skip to content

fix Graph partitionStrategy comment #1368

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
CrazyJvm wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

fix Graph partitionStrategy comment #1368

CrazyJvm wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@CrazyJvm
Copy link
Contributor

@CrazyJvm CrazyJvm commented Jul 11, 2014

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 11, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1368. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16548/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 11, 2014

QA results for PR 1368:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16548/consoleFull

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jul 11, 2014

Thanks. Merging this in master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 282cca0 Jul 11, 2014
@CrazyJvm CrazyJvm deleted the graph-comment-1 branch July 11, 2014 07:08
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
@CrazyJvm @conviva-zz
fix Graph partitionStrategy comment
6b0b8e4 
Author: CrazyJvm <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1368 from CrazyJvm/graph-comment-1 and squashes the following commits:

d47f3c5 [CrazyJvm] fix style
e190d6f [CrazyJvm] fix Graph partitionStrategy comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CrazyJvm @SparkQA @rxin