Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ #8591

Closed
1 task done
RongtongJin opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8590
Closed
1 task done

[Enhancement] Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ #8591

RongtongJin opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8590

Comments

@RongtongJin
Copy link
Contributor

Before Creating the Enhancement Request

  • I have confirmed that this should be classified as an enhancement rather than a bug/feature.

Summary

Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

Motivation

Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

Describe the Solution You'd Like

Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

  • topicStatus
  • consumerProgress
  • resetOffsetByTime
  • queryMsgByUniqueKey
  • queryMsgByKey
  • queryMsgById

Describe Alternatives You've Considered

No

Additional Context

No response

lizhanhui pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
* Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

* Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

* Optimize some code

* Fix some bugs and UTs for lmq support

* Fix UTs can not pass

* Fix UTs can not pass

* Add some check to prevent NPE
lizhanhui pushed a commit to qianye1001/rocketmq that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
…he#8590)

* Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

* Preliminary support for key commands of LMQ

* Optimize some code

* Fix some bugs and UTs for lmq support

* Fix UTs can not pass

* Fix UTs can not pass

* Add some check to prevent NPE
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant