-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 462
PARQUET-686: Clarifications about min-max stats. #55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed this sentence since it no longer applied. (It was a leftover from the early stages of PR #46 when this list was meant to modify the behavior of the
minandmaxfields, but they were made obsolete instead.) However, this also means that the behavior for a missing list is undefined.@rdblue @julienledem How should we define the meaning of
min_valueandmax_valuewhen this list is not present? @lekv What does Impala do if this list is not present?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the column order for a column is not set, Impala only reads stats for numeric types (parquet-column-stats.cc#L130). We treat the values as having been written by older versions of parquet-mr, thus only using stats for types that did not have known issues in the past.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And which fields does Impala read the statistics from if the column order is not set,
minandmaxormin-valueandmax-value?The fact that the statistics are in the
min_valueandmax_valuefields already shows that they are the new kind of statistics and were not written by older versions of parquet-mr.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The check is done for new-style stats, too, since if the column order is unknown, there does not seem to be a safe ordering to assume for all other types. This should not happen with new readers, but some may still use the new fields and not set the column order.
For old fields, we ignore them if column_order is set to anything but TYPE_ORDER. Otherwise we only read them for numeric types.