HDDS-13946. Wrong fields used to determine deleted block size in OM.#9308
Merged
ChenSammi merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Nov 18, 2025
Merged
HDDS-13946. Wrong fields used to determine deleted block size in OM.#9308ChenSammi merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
ChenSammi merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@sumitagrawl @ChenSammi Can you please review the changes? |
ChenSammi
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Contributor
|
Thanks @priyeshkaratha for the fix. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The logic used in block size calculation should use the block’s actual length instead of info.getDataSize(), and the replicated size should be derived from this block length rather than using info.getReplicatedSize().
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
HDDS-13946
How was this patch tested?
Tested manually.