-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 588
HDDS-11134. Create compatibility test for FSO bucket usage #7350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8664d79
HDDS-11134. Create compatibility test for FSO bucket usage
adoroszlai 7b9dcfb
Skip If - not available with old Robot Framework
adoroszlai 8cf3cee
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into HDDS-11134
adoroszlai 82e979c
bucket name cannot have uppercase chars
adoroszlai 6e250c0
log cluster version
adoroszlai 6117126
remove -SNAPSHOT for brevity
adoroszlai 877f91d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into HDDS-11134
adoroszlai 9abc78a
fix variable name
adoroszlai c131aa2
explain need for sed/tr
adoroszlai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't feel right that we are using this approach with relying on test results from another test here. I know it is the same for a common bucket, but could it be avoided for a new test?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ivanzlenko Which "another test" do you mean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ivanzlenko can you please clarify your comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@adoroszlai maybe I'm wrong but it looks like we are consuming here the result of test from write.robot.
If it is not I'm confused why have teardown in one case and not in the other.
More or less want just to clarify things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
read.robotrelies on the content created bywrite.robotby design, because we need to cross-check between versions. E.g. running a 2.0.0 cluster write data with both 1.4.0 and 2.0.0 clients, then verify that they can read content written by the other. This cannot be done in a single self-contained robot test, since that is run in a specific container with a specific Ozone version.upgradetest is somewhat similar (write with one version, upgrade, write with new version, read both with new version).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the clarification! Will keep this in mind!