-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 588
HDDS-11259. [hsync] DataNode should verify HBASE_SUPPORT layout version for every PutBlock. #7012
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
280a77d
HDDS-11259. [hsync] DataNode should verify HBASE_SUPPORT layout versi…
jojochuang 99b6274
Address review comments.
jojochuang 038380c
Remove ozone.incremental.chunk.list from ozone-default.xml
jojochuang 7c5b9c2
Replace UnsupportOperationException with StorageContainerException in…
jojochuang 9b94f0e
Do not mark a container unhealthy if client sends unsupported request…
jojochuang e36387f
Move layout version check earlier to KeyValueHandler for finalizeBlock.
jojochuang File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure the exception is correct here. On the client side we use the unchecked
UnsupportedOperationExceptionbecause it OK to crash the client at that point. On the server we want to throw an exception type and result code that will be translated back to the client. I think this would beStorageContainerExceptionwith a new result code similar toNOT_SUPPORTED_OPERATION_PRIOR_FINALIZATIONwhich exists on the OM.Note that there's no tests in the PR. Per the mailing thread it looks like we are going to do those after the merge which is ok, but we should try to make sure this is working correctly here because I think this is the first time we have rejected a request based on a layout version on the datanode.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah agreed. I think there are DataNode layout upgrade test code somewhere. Let me find out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opening a new jira to track adding the test code to validate layout version upgrade behavior. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11270