HDDS-10594. File encryption info is not properly set when overwrite a file #6445
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tanvipenumudy
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2024
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @ChenSammi, LGTM.
The test failures seem unrelated to the changes (Green CI).
adoroszlai
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2024
Contributor
|
Thanks @ChenSammi for the patch, @tanvipenumudy for the review. |
swamirishi
pushed a commit
to swamirishi/ozone
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2024
…key (apache#6445) (cherry picked from commit 3651d6c) Change-Id: I65f332d2317adad0869ba651090bbbbfb9d4568d
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix the issue that a overwrite file's encryption info is not properly set.
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10594
How was this patch tested?
new unit test logic