HDDS-10325. Make BucketArgs immutable

[adoroszlai]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix findbugs warnings by making BucketArgs immutable. See #6193 for similar change in VolumeArgs.

M V EI: org.apache.hadoop.ozone.client.BucketArgs.getAcls() may expose internal representation by returning BucketArgs.acls  At BucketArgs.java:[line 130]
M V EI: org.apache.hadoop.ozone.client.BucketArgs.getMetadata() may expose internal representation by returning BucketArgs.metadata  At BucketArgs.java:[line 139]
M V EI2: org.apache.hadoop.ozone.client.BucketArgs$Builder.setAcls(List) may expose internal representation by storing an externally mutable object into BucketArgs$Builder.acls  At BucketArgs.java:[line 239]

Also eliminate @SuppressWarnings("parameternumber") by passing the builder to the constructor, instead of individual properties.

Create new constructor in OzoneAcl to simplify instantiation with multiple ACLType (avoid the need to mess with BitSet).

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10325

How was this patch tested?

$ hadoop-ozone/dev-support/checks/findbugs.sh -Dspotbugs.version=4.8.3.0
$ grep -c 'client.BucketArgs' target/findbugs/summary.txt
0

CI:
https://github.com/adoroszlai/ozone/actions/runs/7843743627

[kerneltime]

Suggested change

	if (acls != null && acls.length > 0) {
	if (acls != null) {

[adoroszlai]

What's the problem with acls.length > 0?

[sodonnel]

The length > 0 is handled implicitly by the for loop, so its not really needed. I guess this is a nit - change it if there are other comments, otherwise it will do no harm.

[adoroszlai]

I know that it's not strictly necessary. I have two problems:

1. Don't know the runtime cost of creating an iterator for the empty array in the for loop behind the scene. Maybe the compiler optimizes it away.
2. Running full CI again for such a cosmetic change does not seem worth the effort. Especially when the reviewer cannot spend the extra 10 seconds to write "nit:" or something like that.

[sodonnel]

LGTM

[kerneltime]

Just one minor nit

[adoroszlai]

Thanks @kerneltime, @sodonnel for the review.