-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 615
HDDS-6072. Fix increased integration test execution time #2900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9f6109c
HDDS-6072. Increased integration test execution time
adoroszlai ad5981b
trigger new CI check
adoroszlai 97d9363
trigger new CI check
adoroszlai 3694c3c
trigger new CI check
adoroszlai 002fa2b
trigger new CI check
adoroszlai 4fa841f
Keep server.shutdown() and server.awaitTermination() together
adoroszlai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically this implies triggering server shutdown and readExecutors shutdown (roughly) simutaneously, rather than awaiting readExecutors shutdown first then initiate server shutdown? If so I'm +1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @smengcl for the review. Initially I also suspected
readExecutors, but it's not really the problem.server.shutdown()triggers shutdown in the server's underlying Netty transport. The server'sterminatedflag is set via callbacks,server.awaitTermination()waits for this flag to be set. It seems that this is not happening ifeventLoopGrouphas already been shut down.This can be reproduced easily (on current
master) by changingserver.awaitTermination()to few minutes instead of few seconds. Then we can create thread dump and see these threads being stuck at: