Skip to content

Conversation

@llemec
Copy link
Contributor

@llemec llemec commented Aug 10, 2020

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Added multi line support for Audit messages in TestOzoneAuditLogger
Added hamcrest in testing scope to allow for more legible testing
This PR is a re-submit of the now cancelled #1293, as the git branch got tangled up.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1889

How was this patch tested?

added messageIncludesMultilineException in TestOzoneAuditLogger

@fapifta
Copy link
Contributor

fapifta commented Aug 10, 2020

Hi @llemec,

thank you for the contribution, the test looks good to me, thank you for addressing my concerns from the previous PR ;)

I am +1 on this, let a commiter as well review and commit the changes if he/she does not have any further concerns ;)

Copy link
Contributor

@adoroszlai adoroszlai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @llemec for working on this.

Copy link
Contributor

@adoroszlai adoroszlai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @llemec for updating the patch.

@elek elek changed the title HDDS-1889 Add support for verifying multiline log entry HDDS-1889. Add support for verifying multiline log entry Aug 12, 2020
@adoroszlai
Copy link
Contributor

@dineshchitlangia would you like to review this audit log test improvement?

Copy link
Contributor

@dineshchitlangia dineshchitlangia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 LGTM.
Thanks @llemec for the contribution, @fapifta and @adoroszlai for the reviews.

@dineshchitlangia dineshchitlangia merged commit dc5a997 into apache:master Sep 3, 2020
rakeshadr pushed a commit to rakeshadr/hadoop-ozone that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants