Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ORC-1520: Removed JDK 8 settings from pom #1639

Closed

Conversation

paliwalashish
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR proposes to remove jdk8 related parameters from pom, since we moved to JDK 17 as part of #1627

Why are the changes needed?

Since we moved to JDK 17, JDK 8 parameters are not relevant any more.
This shall keep files up to date with changes

How was this patch tested?

Build runs successfully with the changes.

@paliwalashish paliwalashish changed the title ORD-1520: Removed JDK 8 settings from pom ORC-1520: Removed JDK 8 settings from pom Oct 17, 2023
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Oct 24, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thank you, @mystic-lama .

cxzl25 pushed a commit to cxzl25/orc that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR proposes to remove jdk8 related parameters from pom, since we moved to JDK 17 as part of apache#1627

### Why are the changes needed?
Since we moved to JDK 17, JDK 8 parameters are not relevant any more.
This shall keep files up to date with changes

### How was this patch tested?
Build runs successfully with the changes.

Closes apache#1639 from mystic-lama/ORC-1520_remove_jdk8_settings.

Lead-authored-by: mystic-lama <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yiqun Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants