Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

WIP: Operator tuning #8670

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

cjolivier01
Copy link
Member

@cjolivier01 cjolivier01 commented Nov 15, 2017

@piiswrong

Description

Operator tuning

Checklist

Essentials

  • Passed code style checking (make lint)
  • Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
  • All changes have test coverage
  • For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated. For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are well-documented.
  • To my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

Changes

  • Feature1, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)
  • Feature2, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)

Comments

  • If this change is a backward incompatible change, why must this change be made.
  • Interesting edge cases to note here

s, new_oshape.Size(), req[0], lstride, rstride, oshape,
inputs[0].dptr<DType>(), inputs[1].dptr<DType>(), outputs[0].dptr<DType>(),
inputs[0].Size(), inputs[1].Size());
mshadow::Shape<NDim> oshape = new_oshape.get<NDim>();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My IDE (CLion) isn't very good at matching up namespaces

@cjolivier01 cjolivier01 changed the title Refreshed branch bc_tune Operator tuning Nov 15, 2017
@cjolivier01 cjolivier01 changed the title Operator tuning WIP: Operator tuning Nov 15, 2017
@cjolivier01
Copy link
Member Author

Real PR: #8686

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant