updating License for dlpack for v1.8 release

[access2rohit]

Description

update dlpack's LICENSE #19427

Checklist

Essentials

• Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)

[mxnet-bot]

Hey @access2rohit , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one or more tests again with the following commands:

• To trigger all jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [all]
• To trigger specific jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [job1, job2]

---

CI supported jobs: [clang, windows-cpu, windows-gpu, centos-cpu, unix-cpu, centos-gpu, edge, miscellaneous, website, unix-gpu, sanity]

---

Note:
Only following 3 categories can trigger CI :PR Author, MXNet Committer, Jenkins Admin.
All CI tests must pass before the PR can be merged.

[access2rohit]

@samskalicky @leezu Can you review ?

[sandeep-krishnamurthy]

Thank you.

[leezu]

There is no need to update the copyright notice. TVM doesn't include copyright notice (https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/blob/39cd612cdbf9a2443b5561b90b4b4a55996274f1/LICENSE#L203-L240) and it's not mentioned in the https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html

[access2rohit]

There is no need to update the copyright notice. TVM doesn't include copyright notice (https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/blob/39cd612cdbf9a2443b5561b90b4b4a55996274f1/LICENSE#L203-L240) and it's not mentioned in the https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html

Its not for TVM it is for dlpack which is MXNet's direct dependecy. I made this PR to be consistent with what already exists in the MXNet's LICENSE file

[leezu]

It's great to be consistent with the existing MXNet License file but my point is that such consistent inclusion will be very hard to keep updated at every release and isn't needed according to the ASF licensing howto and TVM's practice: The howto states "In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the distribution and a short note summarizing its licensing" and does not require the inclusion of copyright statements.

[josephevans]

This change is already included in #19440, you can close this PR. Thanks @access2rohit