Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

[v1.x] Backport of Fix BatchNorm backward synchronization (#18644) #18654

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2020

Conversation

anko-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Description

[v1.x] Backport of Fix BatchNorm backward synchronization (#18644)

* Add test for BatchNorm running variables synchronization

* Fix BatchNorm backward synchronization

It fixes issue apache#18610
@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Hey @anko-intel , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one or more tests again with the following commands:

  • To trigger all jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [all]
  • To trigger specific jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [job1, job2]

CI supported jobs: [centos-cpu, centos-gpu, edge, unix-cpu, sanity, clang, unix-gpu, windows-gpu, windows-cpu, website, miscellaneous]


Note:
Only following 3 categories can trigger CI :PR Author, MXNet Committer, Jenkins Admin.
All CI tests must pass before the PR can be merged.

@anko-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu]

@pengzhao-intel pengzhao-intel requested a review from TaoLv July 3, 2020 00:42
@wkcn
Copy link
Member

wkcn commented Jul 5, 2020

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu]

@wkcn
Copy link
Member

wkcn commented Jul 9, 2020

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu]

@TaoLv TaoLv merged commit 024daa6 into apache:v1.x Jul 9, 2020
ChaiBapchya pushed a commit to ChaiBapchya/mxnet that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
…) (apache#18654)

* Add test for BatchNorm running variables synchronization

* Fix BatchNorm backward synchronization

It fixes issue apache#18610
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants