Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

[v1.x] Improve activation backward (#17973) #18112

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: v1.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TaoLv
Copy link
Member

@TaoLv TaoLv commented Apr 20, 2020

  • fix activation backward

  • comments

  • fix

Description

(Brief description on what this PR is about)

Checklist

Essentials

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

  • The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant JIRA issue created (except PRs with tiny changes)
  • Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
  • All changes have test coverage:
  • Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator)
  • Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore)
  • Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL)
  • Code is well-documented:
  • For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated.
  • For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented.
  • For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable
  • Check the API doc at https://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html
  • To the best of my knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

Changes

  • Feature1, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)
  • Feature2, tests, (and when applicable, API doc)

Comments

  • If this change is a backward incompatible change, why must this change be made.
  • Interesting edge cases to note here

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Hey @TaoLv , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one or more tests again with the following commands:

  • To trigger all jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [all]
  • To trigger specific jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [job1, job2]

CI supported jobs: [unix-gpu, sanity, miscellaneous, centos-gpu, clang, unix-cpu, centos-cpu, windows-gpu, edge, website, windows-cpu]


Note:
Only following 3 categories can trigger CI :PR Author, MXNet Committer, Jenkins Admin.
All CI tests must pass before the PR can be merged.

@TaoLv TaoLv added the v1.x Targeting v1.x branch label Apr 20, 2020
@TaoLv
Copy link
Member Author

TaoLv commented Apr 20, 2020

cc @ciyongch

@ciyongch
Copy link
Contributor

ciyongch commented Apr 21, 2020

Thanks @TaoLv , please backport this PR to v1.7.x branch as well.

@TaoLv
Copy link
Member Author

TaoLv commented Apr 21, 2020

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu]

@ciyongch
Copy link
Contributor

CI failed again, please re-trigger CI :)

@TaoLv
Copy link
Member Author

TaoLv commented Apr 24, 2020

@mxnet-bot run ci [all]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [edge, website, miscellaneous, clang, unix-cpu, centos-cpu, windows-cpu, centos-gpu, sanity, unix-gpu, windows-gpu]

@TaoLv
Copy link
Member Author

TaoLv commented Apr 24, 2020

@mxnet-bot run ci [all]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [edge, clang, website, unix-gpu, windows-gpu, miscellaneous, centos-cpu, sanity, windows-cpu, unix-cpu, centos-gpu]

@ciyongch
Copy link
Contributor

Please help to fix the pylint error as the CI is much stable now:)

* fix activation backward

* comments

* fix
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
v1.x Targeting v1.x branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants